To someone else. Why?
Some project managers accidentally stumble into the profession. Others enter the field on purpose. Both groups tend to settle into a particular way of managing projects, and over time it seems most form specific ideas about what works and what doesn’t from their experience.
Projects in general have some similarities.
- producing something new
- there’s a team
- there are stakeholders
I can’t think of any universal constants in projects right now.? There seems to be an inherently larger number of specific differences you could cite among projects.
- location/culture
- product type
- technologies used
- organizational culture
- regulatory requirements
- size of project in $$
- length of project
- stakeholder personalities
- team personalities
- industry
- specialties
- etc.
In the end, this is why someone who has held a particular philosophy for 20 years about project management can be rediculed for holding that belief from someone else.? It’s worked for 20 years, how can it be wrong?