<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 10 Key Capabilities of Next-Generation Project Managers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/</link>
	<description>Helping new and aspiring project managers reach their career goals!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:32:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/#comment-15763</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=4212#comment-15763</guid>
		<description>My old management textbook (written in the 80&#039;s) has a whole bunch of stuff from gthe 1950s about how treating people well and enabling them gets more and better out of them.

This isn&#039;t new to Gen y,z, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My old management textbook (written in the 80&#8242;s) has a whole bunch of stuff from gthe 1950s about how treating people well and enabling them gets more and better out of them.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t new to Gen y,z, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/#comment-25611</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=4212#comment-25611</guid>
		<description>My old management textbook (written in the 80&#039;s) has a whole bunch of stuff from gthe 1950s about how treating people well and enabling them gets more and better out of them.

This isn&#039;t new to Gen y,z, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My old management textbook (written in the 80&#8242;s) has a whole bunch of stuff from gthe 1950s about how treating people well and enabling them gets more and better out of them.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t new to Gen y,z, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galleman</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/#comment-15679</link>
		<dc:creator>galleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=4212#comment-15679</guid>
		<description>Great observation. That approach is common in many other PM domains. EV is one of my favorites - where bad examples are used to introduce yet another bad example. Or criticisms of a tool or process are provided when in fact the critic does not actually use that tool of process.

It&#039;s the argument - &quot;it didn&#039;t work for me, it can&#039;t work for you.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observation. That approach is common in many other PM domains. EV is one of my favorites &#8211; where bad examples are used to introduce yet another bad example. Or criticisms of a tool or process are provided when in fact the critic does not actually use that tool of process.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the argument &#8211; &#8220;it didn&#8217;t work for me, it can&#8217;t work for you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galleman</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/#comment-25610</link>
		<dc:creator>galleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=4212#comment-25610</guid>
		<description>Great observation. That approach is common in many other PM domains. EV is one of my favorites - where bad examples are used to introduce yet another bad example. Or criticisms of a tool or process are provided when in fact the critic does not actually use that tool of process.

It&#039;s the argument - &quot;it didn&#039;t work for me, it can&#039;t work for you.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observation. That approach is common in many other PM domains. EV is one of my favorites &#8211; where bad examples are used to introduce yet another bad example. Or criticisms of a tool or process are provided when in fact the critic does not actually use that tool of process.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the argument &#8211; &#8220;it didn&#8217;t work for me, it can&#8217;t work for you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galleman</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator>galleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=4212#comment-15678</guid>
		<description>Craig,
The actual term of &quot;professional amateurs.&quot; I see them all the time. They talk about all the ways to improve PM in the presence of bad PM, but don&#039;t actually practice PM - good or bad.

Usually they&#039;re instructional services providers, book authors, and self proclaimed experts. When you poke a little deeper and ask &quot;what tool, processes, methods and skills do you personally apply to the project you manage today and in the recent past?&quot; You get a NULL answer.

I&#039;ve grown weary of listening to the &quot;advice&quot; givers who themselves do not manage projects on a daily basis - present company excluded Josh, since you earned you&#039;re living managing NASA projects until recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,<br />
The actual term of &#8220;professional amateurs.&#8221; I see them all the time. They talk about all the ways to improve PM in the presence of bad PM, but don&#8217;t actually practice PM &#8211; good or bad.</p>
<p>Usually they&#8217;re instructional services providers, book authors, and self proclaimed experts. When you poke a little deeper and ask &#8220;what tool, processes, methods and skills do you personally apply to the project you manage today and in the recent past?&#8221; You get a NULL answer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve grown weary of listening to the &#8220;advice&#8221; givers who themselves do not manage projects on a daily basis &#8211; present company excluded Josh, since you earned you&#8217;re living managing NASA projects until recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galleman</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/the-10-key-capabilities-of-next-generation-project-managers/#comment-25609</link>
		<dc:creator>galleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=4212#comment-25609</guid>
		<description>Craig,
The actual term of &quot;professional amateurs.&quot; I see them all the time. They talk about all the ways to improve PM in the presence of bad PM, but don&#039;t actually practice PM - good or bad.

Usually they&#039;re instructional services providers, book authors, and self proclaimed experts. When you poke a little deeper and ask &quot;what tool, processes, methods and skills do you personally apply to the project you manage today and in the recent past?&quot; You get a NULL answer.

I&#039;ve grown weary of listening to the &quot;advice&quot; givers who themselves do not manage projects on a daily basis - present company excluded Josh, since you earned you&#039;re living managing NASA projects until recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,<br />
The actual term of &#8220;professional amateurs.&#8221; I see them all the time. They talk about all the ways to improve PM in the presence of bad PM, but don&#8217;t actually practice PM &#8211; good or bad.</p>
<p>Usually they&#8217;re instructional services providers, book authors, and self proclaimed experts. When you poke a little deeper and ask &#8220;what tool, processes, methods and skills do you personally apply to the project you manage today and in the recent past?&#8221; You get a NULL answer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve grown weary of listening to the &#8220;advice&#8221; givers who themselves do not manage projects on a daily basis &#8211; present company excluded Josh, since you earned you&#8217;re living managing NASA projects until recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

