Benefit

Psych!

Unfortunately, there is no ONE best type of contract because the risk the vendor and customer share is determined by the contract type.  The best thing you can do is understand who bares the risks or benefits of each.  Being I don’t know if you are a vendor, a customer, or a project manager, this objective description of each contract type should help shed some light on the subject.

There are three categories of contracts: Fixed-Price, Cost-Reimbursable, and Time and Material (T&M).

Fixed-Price is a contract category involving setting a fixed total price for a defined scope of work to be provided.  Fixed-price may also incorporate financial incentives for achieving or exceeding selected project objectives, such as schedule delivery dates, cost and technical performance, or anything that can be quantified and subsequently measured.   Vendors under fixed-price contracts are legally obligated to complete these contracts, with possible financial damages if they do not.  Under the fixed-price arrangement, vendors must precisely specify the products or services being offered.  Changes in scope can be accommodated, but generally at an increase in contact price.  The three common types of fixed-price contracts are Firm Fixed Price Contracts (FFP), Fixed Price Incentive Fee Contracts (FPIF), and Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment Contracts (FP-EPA). [risk is on the vendor]

Cost-reimbursable is a contract category involving payments (cost reimbursements) to the vendor for all legitimate actual costs incurred for completed work, plus a fee representing vendor profit.  Cost-reimbursable contracts may also include financial incentive clauses whenever the seller exceeds, or falls below, defined objectives such as costs, schedule, or technical performance targets.  Why would anyone ever use this contract vehicle?  Assume the customer doesn’t know what they want.  By absolving the vendor of risk, they may actually get something delivered.  Three of the more common types of cost-reimbursable contracts in use are Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), and Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF). [risk is on the customer]

Time and Materials (T&M) is a hybrid type of contractual arrangement that contains aspects of both fixed-price and cost-reimbursable contracts.  They are often used for staff changes, acquisition of experts, and any outside support when a precise statement of work cannot be quickly prescribed. [blended risk]

So there you have it, the three categories of contracts.  Some people make it their job to know these inside and out.  I wouldn’t recommend getting too far into the weeds unless this topic really interests you.  If there is one takeaway from this post, I would say remember which party is at risk and which party will benefit. It’s not fun being on the short end of that stick.

Image courtesy of: Shutterstock

{ 20 comments }

comptech

project management career path - photo by deanj via Flickr

A member of the pmStudent community contacted me for advice about where she should focus her efforts with the end goal of being a great project manager.  I’ll give my thoughts, and would love to get input for her from the rest of you as well.

“I am wondering if it is better to be a good programmer first, really good specialist (technically) and than become PM, or maybe other way…would be better to gain more experience as a member of IT team as a programmer, then team leader, try to find a job in a big IT company OR to try to gain PM experience in small company with small projects.”

First off, THANK YOU for contacting me with the question!  I applaud your maturity in formulating a plan to reach your career goals!

There are different thoughts on this, and it does depend on the type and size of projects you plan to work on.  I agree with what Bill Duncan has said before here on pmStudent.com:

“Technically skilled and knowledgeable PMs are fine on smaller, simpler projects where they are as apt to be making technical decisions as management decisions. But as their projects get larger and/or more managerially complex, they will be making management decisions, and their technical skills are as likely to be a handicap as a benefit.”

“I’ve seen many, many, more situations where the PM got into trouble because [he or she] did not have the sense to defer to the technical leads on the project.”

One of the most dangerous things on a project can be a technical PM who thinks they know (or really do know) more than the technical leads and takes on technical decisions when they should not.   On small projects this can be fine, but as the project increases in technical complexity and size, there’s an increased risk of bad consequences from having too much power and knowledge in one person.   The PM should know enough to understand what is going on at a high level technically, but not enough that day-to-day technical decisions are being made by a PM.  The PM should be primarily focused on communication and management as much as possible.  Project managers can benefit by earning an MBA online or similar master’s degree.

The key is being able to effectively communicate with the techies and business suits…you need a foot in both worlds for this.  Personally, in your situation I would:

Shape Your PM Career
Get started and get ahead in your project management career.
  • Continue working as a member of the project team
  • Start asking your project manager (and those managing other projects) what you can do to help them out
  • Show your interest in what the project managers are doing, and ask them questions.  Most people are very happy to help as long as you are tactful and not too demanding or annoying!
  • Be willing to commit your own personal time without pay to gain valuable experience and build relationships with mentors
  • Start thinking about the work you and your team are doing from both the technical AND management perspective

Leave a comment below and let’s get a discussion going here!

{ 18 comments }