Subscribe!

Performance or Knowledge?

Your move

Your move

I learned to play chess when I was about 10 or 11. I know how each piece moves. I know how to avoid Fool’s Mate. I know a few opening gambits. I know the relative value of the various pieces. I played with my friends and won about as many games as I lost. If you gave me a chess quiz, I suspect that I could get at least 61% percent right.

My 19 year old son, Michael, stares at me blankly when I mention the King’s Gambit or the Ruy Lopez opening. He knows nothing about chess notation and has never heard of Tal or Kasparov.

But he beats me consistently. I have the knowledge; he is a better performer.

If you are a project manager, which category do you fit into? Do you have the knowledge (and the credential to prove it?), or you a performer? If you are a performer, wouldn’t you like to be able to get a credential that proves it? Have I got a deal for you …

Let’s start with full disclosure. In addition to running my own project management consulting and training company, I also volunteer for a couple of professional associations. One is the American Society for the Advancement of Project Management (asapm — we use lower case to remind us to be humble), and the other is the Global Alliance for Project Performance Standards (GAPPS, www.globalpmstandards.org). asapm is a member of GAPPS and is also the USA Member Association in the International Project Management Association (IPMA, the world’s oldest international project management organization). My main responsibility for asapm is to run its certification program — a program that uses a performance-based competency standard (PBCS) developed by GAPPS in its assessment.

Although fairly new to project management, performance-based competencies have been widely used throughout the world for over 20 years. The governments of Australia and New Zealand have nation-wide competence assessment systems that use performance-based competencies for everything from sports referees to chief executives.

Our system requires you to providence evidence that you can satisfy 100% of the performance criteria. You must provide both documentary evidence and verbal evidence. For example, do you have a list of stakeholders (documentary evidence) and can you also explain why and how the list was developed (verbal evidence)? It takes most people about 6-8 hours to gather the documentary evidence, and the interview with our two-person assessment team takes about 2 hours. Since you don’t need to buy any books to prepare (all of the support material is available for FREE online), and you don’t need to take any expensive preparation courses, most candidates spend much less for this performance-based credential than they would spend for the most popular knowledge-based credential.

More details at www.pmcert.org, or post a question here and I’ll try to respond promptly.

About the Author

Bill Duncan

Primary author of original PMBOK Guide. Consultant and trainer in PM since 1983.

3 Responses to “Performance or Knowledge?”

  1. I love the idea of a competence-based certification, Bill. Do you find that most companies are OK with someone submitting documents and artifacts as evidence? At my last company all of the project artifacts were controlled as proprietary, and now I work for a government contractor where an NDA is required before access can be granted.

    How does the process normally work with these considerations?

    Reply

  2. Most organizations are willing to sign an NDA between themselves and asapm/PMCert: all of our assessors have signed an agreement to honor any NDAs that we sign.

    In many cases, an organization will want to have multiple PMs assessed, and then we can have the specific assessors sign an NDA, and we can even make arrangements to have all of the documentation stay on-site.

    In an extreme case, we might be able to process documents that were redacted as long as there was adequate evidence that the documents were associated with the project that the candidate managed.

    Duncan

    Reply

  3. Hi folks,
    Don’t forget that the well established and highly respected Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International has also adopted the GAPPS competency standard as the basis for our own Certified Portfolio, Program and Project Manager (C3PM) credential. http://www.aacei.org/certification/C3PM/welcome.shtml

    Not only is AACE older than PMI and IPMA (established in 1953) but despite a lousy choice of names, the people who belong to AACE are mostly project controls (PMO) professionals.

    Also, unlike “other” professional organizations, AACE has made our equivalent of PMI’s PMBOK Guide on line for anyone to download at no cost. http://www.aacei.org/tcm/

    And unlike some other professional organizations who tout “average” (“used on most projects, most of the time”) practices, AACE actually has published “Recommended (Best) Practices”(RP’s). Subtle but important differences.

    And unlike other professional organiztions that charge for EVERYTHING, AACE makes our RP’s available for free download as well. http://www.aacei.org/technical/rp.shtml

    Bottom line- do not confuse “size” with the quality of the content nor “marketing hype” with the respect and integrity of the credentials. http://www.aacei.org/certification/ “Bigger” is not always “better”.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta
    http://www.getpmcertified.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply