Managing Stakeholders Empathetically

by Josh

I recently came across this article on managing stakeholders.  It refers to a widely used and taught model of stakeholder management.

The article is a good overview and categorization of the types of stakeholders and their relative interest and influence on the project.  It’s a helpful model and I agree with it’s use a guideline.

I would like to talk about why it is so important to properly identify and manage stakeholders.

Empathic Project Management

One of the most important capabilities a project manager needs to hone is empathy.

From Merriam-Webster’s definition of empathy:

2 : the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner; also : the capacity for this

Don’t confuse my meaning of empathy with sympathy, or getting all emotional.  It’s simply about being able to simulate the perspective of someone else, and thus understand them better.

However you do it, a structured process of 1) identifying and 2) assessing stakeholders will make you a more effective project manager.  I have learned the hard way in my own career about the negative impacts of having 1) not identified all stakeholders and 2) misunderstanding the intentions and goals of stakeholders, especially key stakeholders.  Part of that assessment is the use of empathy to “put yourself in their shoes” and understand your project from their perspective.

For this reason, do not limit your analysis to their interest and influence.  You must also identify what their goals are…what context they bring with them…their perception of how the project will impact them, etc.

By the way, I know identification and assessment are just first steps…but in doing just those two things, you will be more effective.

A Tale of Two Stakeholders

For example, pretend that key Stakeholder A is relatively new to the company, open to change for the better, and has a positive perception of how your project will impact their team/department.  Stakeholder B has the exact same interest and influence, but they have survived 2 previous failed attempts at implementing similar projects, are very resistant to change, and have a very negative perception of how your project will impact their team/department if it were to be successful.

The interest/influence matrix is a helpful starting point, but effective stakeholder management is a multivariate undertaking.  An empathic analysis helps uncover those hidden variables so you can proactively decide how to deal with them.  You may find that it is more useful to spend time building trust with a low interest / low influence stakeholder than a high interest / high influence stakeholder in the end, IF the latter is highly inclined to support your project.

In other words, potential influence and active influence are two very different things.

What are your thoughts on empathy and stakeholder management?  Leave a comment below, it’s easy!

No related posts.

Leave a Comment


{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Laura Bamberg April 29, 2010 at 6:06 pm

Hey Josh – once again, good post! Thought I’d share our stakeholder perspectives w/ you and your readers. Hope it helps!
http://www.steelray.com/blog/?p=3
http://www.steelray.com/blog/?p=5
http://www.steelray.com/blog/?p=7
http://www.steelray.com/blog/?p=8

Reply

Dr. Paul D. Giammalvo April 29, 2010 at 2:52 pm

Josh,

You may want to Google on Logical Framework (the LogFrame is the document it produces) which is used by the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and other bi- and multi-lateral lending agencies and NGO's to not only identify stakeholders needs, wants and expectations (stated and otherwise) but also how to link the application of RESOURCES, through PROJECTS, to achieve strategic objectives.

Surprisingly (or maybe not so?) outside of the International Development applications, the use of the Logical Framework process is rarely ever used.

BR,

Dr. PDG, Jakarta

Reply

Josh Nankivel April 29, 2010 at 4:55 pm

Thanks Dr. Paul, very interesting!

For those interested in LogFrame, I found this annotated example:

http://www.ifad.org/evaluation/guide/annexb/Ann

-Josh

Reply

Laura Bamberg April 29, 2010 at 6:07 pm

Hey Josh – great post as usual! Here is some of our perspective. Hope it helps your readers too!
http://www.steelray.com/blog/?p=8

Reply

wrduncan3 May 1, 2010 at 3:56 pm

There was an article in the IJPM a few years ago that added a third dimension to this model: legitimacy. This gives you seven main categories of stakeholders. As well, it is useful to remember that a stakeholder's category may change during the course of the project: stakeholder analysis needs to be a ongoing process that is integrated with everything else you do.

Important as well to remember that most stakeholders cannot actually be managed. What you are actually doing is managing stakeholder relationships. And that is the name of the first unit in the GAPPS project manager standard:
http://www/globalpmstandards.org

Reply

Kareem Shaker May 19, 2010 at 4:48 pm

Hello Josh,
Understanding project stakeholders is a crucial success factor, knowing their preferences and background is even more important, it's pretty much like playing chess, if you understand the style of the stakeholder you can easily anticipate their needs and even their future actions, building a project management plan that barely includes names, designations, contacts, etc. is not enough.

I have written about stakeholder analysis and communication management in general in this post: http://kareemshaker.com/communication/communica

I also have modeled a communication management plan in my preferred mind mapping tool Xmind.

Thanks Josh.

Reply

designingslides February 7, 2011 at 4:30 pm

Hi,

I have just tried to read the article [1], and the uri is not running :(

Regards,

[1]: http://www.myprojectvault.com/howto002_manage-stakeholders.htm

Reply

Josh February 7, 2011 at 7:42 pm

Seems they took the website down. :-(

Reply

Previous post:

Next post: