Subscribe!

A Question of Ethics

Official congressional portrait of former cong...
Image via Wikipedia

Craig over at Better Projects posted something interesting. It deals with ethical implications raised by a scenario in which you are a contractor bidding on a government project with ITAR sensitivity. Some of your people are not US persons per the ITAR guidelines. I have some limited experience with this one that I would like to share.

ITAR applies not only to DOD agencies, but all companies and agencies in the United States where the type of work may pose security concerns per the ITAR regulation with the people involved.

In your stated example, I am fairly certain that your company would not be able to bid on the contract period, regardless of the status of Sara and Johnny. This is a foreign company, so pretty much anyone who is not a US Citizen is going to be unable to work on this. Presumably, the rest of your team are also non-US persons, since you are based out of Australia or wherever.

That said, let’s assume you are a US company with the majority of your staff being US-persons and fine to work ITAR projects. I work with a different agency (not the DOD) and we are having to deal with this as well. Sometimes we don’t like or agree with policies, but if we want to play their game, they are the rule makers.

To your specific question, here are my preferred approaches in order of best to worst.

  1. Find other non-ITAR projects for Sara and Johnny, and use other staff for the ITAR project.
  2. See if Sara and Johnny can be utilized in such a way that ITAR-sensitive information can be shielded from them. If this is possible and the controls are demonstrable, the agency’s contracting officer may allow it.
  3. If you have no other prospects for other contracts and Sara and Johnny have no work, declining this contract is only going to hurt the rest of the team too. If this is your only option, the last resort is to enter into contract, get it staffed with people who do not have any ITAR difficulties.  Then, I would keep Johnny and Sara in the loop and let them know I will keep them on staff and paid for as long as I can doing internal work for the company as I go out and try like hell to get another contract they can work on. I would let them know right away how valuable they are to the company and how much I would like to keep them. At the same time, I would immediately offer to give recommendations for any potential employers should they choose to start looking around.

This is a time when your team members need you the most.  The most ethical approach is to do the right thing as well as you can within the constraints and situation at hand.

About the Author

Josh Nankivel, BSc PM, PMP

I help new and aspiring project managers reach their career goals! About me - Connect with me on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and FriendFeed or send me an email.

3 Responses to “A Question of Ethics”

  1. Thanks for the interest Josh.

    A point on ITAR – only some nationals are on the exclusion list. Born and bred in Australia I am able to do the work. (We have several large US military installations here and we buy almost all our armaments from the US.)

    And a point on nationaity – It is defined differently in different countries and some of the values associated with the definitions shape legislation and basic expectation.

    For example, I undestand that you have to have been born in the US to become preident. No such rules here.

    Once you sign up as a citizen you get he full set of rights. And you don’t even have to renounce your former citizenship.

    Bigamy, however, is illegal.

    Reply

  2. Oh boy, ITAR got even more confusing for me! Thanks for the clarification Craig, I did not know about the Australian guidelines. Since the company I work for is US-based, we’ve never had to worry about that part of it. Do you know if the same is true in the UK?

    Josh Nankivel
    Project Management Student
    The Art of Project Management

    Reply

  3. Josh and Craig,
    ITAR is a convoluted regulation. Teams of lawyers are needed just to keep the updates straight. “Foreign National” is a universal term for DoD, NASA and similar contracting agencies. Buying something from Italy is not the same as having Italians working on your program. We buy “stuff” from foreign nationals all the time. They just can’t come in the building to see it!
    Glen B. Alleman
    VP, Program Planning and Controls

    Reply

Leave a Reply