<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agile&#8230;  No PM Needed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/</link>
	<description>Helping new and aspiring project managers reach their career goals!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody Williams</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/#comment-11833</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=3341#comment-11833</guid>
		<description>Configuration Management is included in PMI (PMBOK). The Configuration Management Plan is a part of the Project Management Plan. There is a PMI Global Standard, &quot;Practice Standard for Project Configuration Management,&quot; as well. CM is related to Activities performed as well as Requirements, according to PMI thought. At least at this level, there is no lack of focus.

As you so correctly pointed out, &quot;focus&quot; is the key and many who play the role of project manager are not focused on the most important criteria. As Agile, Lean, and Scrum make headway in redirecting focus, more organizations and project managers will &quot;redirect&quot; themselves ;~)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Configuration Management is included in PMI (PMBOK). The Configuration Management Plan is a part of the Project Management Plan. There is a PMI Global Standard, &#8220;Practice Standard for Project Configuration Management,&#8221; as well. CM is related to Activities performed as well as Requirements, according to PMI thought. At least at this level, there is no lack of focus.</p>
<p>As you so correctly pointed out, &#8220;focus&#8221; is the key and many who play the role of project manager are not focused on the most important criteria. As Agile, Lean, and Scrum make headway in redirecting focus, more organizations and project managers will &#8220;redirect&#8221; themselves ;~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody Williams</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/#comment-25190</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=3341#comment-25190</guid>
		<description>Configuration Management is included in PMI (PMBOK). The Configuration Management Plan is a part of the Project Management Plan. There is a PMI Global Standard, &quot;Practice Standard for Project Configuration Management,&quot; as well. CM is related to Activities performed as well as Requirements, according to PMI thought. At least at this level, there is no lack of focus.

As you so correctly pointed out, &quot;focus&quot; is the key and many who play the role of project manager are not focused on the most important criteria. As Agile, Lean, and Scrum make headway in redirecting focus, more organizations and project managers will &quot;redirect&quot; themselves ;~)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Configuration Management is included in PMI (PMBOK). The Configuration Management Plan is a part of the Project Management Plan. There is a PMI Global Standard, &#8220;Practice Standard for Project Configuration Management,&#8221; as well. CM is related to Activities performed as well as Requirements, according to PMI thought. At least at this level, there is no lack of focus.</p>
<p>As you so correctly pointed out, &#8220;focus&#8221; is the key and many who play the role of project manager are not focused on the most important criteria. As Agile, Lean, and Scrum make headway in redirecting focus, more organizations and project managers will &#8220;redirect&#8221; themselves ;~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nankivel</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/#comment-11817</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nankivel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=3341#comment-11817</guid>
		<description>Very well stated!  That could have been a new post all by itself!

Thanks for the comment Woody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well stated!  That could have been a new post all by itself!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment Woody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nankivel</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/#comment-25189</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nankivel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=3341#comment-25189</guid>
		<description>Very well stated!  That could have been a new post all by itself!

Thanks for the comment Woody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well stated!  That could have been a new post all by itself!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment Woody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen B. Alleman</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/#comment-11808</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen B. Alleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=3341#comment-11808</guid>
		<description>Woody,

Great piece. 

We must always be reminded that when someone is &quot;counter selling,&quot; &quot;my method is better than the one you&#039;re using&quot; - they are selling, no matter how noble their position. 

They are not solving a problem. This is especially true when the &quot;unassailable benefical outcome&quot; is missing from the selling proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody,</p>
<p>Great piece. </p>
<p>We must always be reminded that when someone is &#8220;counter selling,&#8221; &#8220;my method is better than the one you&#8217;re using&#8221; &#8211; they are selling, no matter how noble their position. </p>
<p>They are not solving a problem. This is especially true when the &#8220;unassailable benefical outcome&#8221; is missing from the selling proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen B. Alleman</title>
		<link>http://pmstudent.com/agile-no-pm-needed/#comment-25188</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen B. Alleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmstudent.com/?p=3341#comment-25188</guid>
		<description>Woody,

Great piece. 

We must always be reminded that when someone is &quot;counter selling,&quot; &quot;my method is better than the one you&#039;re using&quot; - they are selling, no matter how noble their position. 

They are not solving a problem. This is especially true when the &quot;unassailable benefical outcome&quot; is missing from the selling proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody,</p>
<p>Great piece. </p>
<p>We must always be reminded that when someone is &#8220;counter selling,&#8221; &#8220;my method is better than the one you&#8217;re using&#8221; &#8211; they are selling, no matter how noble their position. </p>
<p>They are not solving a problem. This is especially true when the &#8220;unassailable benefical outcome&#8221; is missing from the selling proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

