by Josh

Why - by annnna via Flickr

Why - by annnna via Flickr

tony had just finished a year-long project, and was exhausted.  As a good project manager should, he had been keeping a lessons learned file throughout the project, and now that it was completed he was making a final entry, looking back over the whole year.

Let’s peek into one of the lessons learned Tony and his team picked for this particular project, and how they got to the root cause by asking a simple question. Why?

Symptom: The project had gone through several “re-scoping” activities during the year…it seemed as if the goals were always changing.

1

Why was the scope always changing?
Because the direction and needs of the customer changed throughout the year, and we responded to those changes.

2

Why did we receive different direction at different times?
Because a different individual customer was giving the direction at different times.

3

Why did the individual customer who was giving us direction change?
Because we didn’t have a clear idea of who was responsible for which area of scope.

4

Why didn’t we have a clear idea of who was responsible for which area of scope?
Because we didn’t push the customer to agree on a responsibility matrix for their own people; we only did this for our own team.

5

Why didn’t we push for a responsibility matrix including the customer staff?
Because we did not include the customer as an integral part of the project team. We focused too much on our own team as the performing organization, and not enough on the external stakeholders.

Lesson Learned: Always require a clear responsibility matrix, including decision authority, for the whole project team, including the customer’s staff!

Do you have an example how the 5 Why’s technique was (or could be) used to uncover the root causes in your projects?  Leave a comment below and share your experience!

3 Comments

Glen B. AllemanMay 27, 2009 4:46 pm

Josh,

Here’s my outside opinion on the items
1. Scope changes. a Change Control process must be used to deal with these changes. Cost and schedule impacts are assessed.

2. The PM needs to have a “free and frank” conversation about this behaviour

3. Not having a RAM means this is the result. The “free and frank” discussion with the customer is needed again

4. ditto

5. ditto

Build the !@#$ RAM ;>) Hang it on the wall, don’t let the customer get away with this.

Josh NankivelMay 27, 2009 4:51 pm

Thanks Glen, couldn’t have said it better myself.

pm411 (pm411)July 27, 2009 12:18 pm

Twitter Comment


RT @pmstudent Project Manager Discovers Why He’s Pulled All His Hair Out | pmStudent [link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

Leave A Comment

Posting your comment...

Subscribe to these comment via email
blog comments powered by Disqus
http://pmstudent.com/wp-content/themes/selecta